The University of Melbourne Collection Policy 2006
APPENDIX 3: Collection Decision-Making Framework
-
Purpose
As part of the preparation and thinking regarding the creation/development of Learning Hubs it became apparent that a decision-making framework was needed to provide guidelines for evaluating collections and making decisions on what materials (print and non-book) would need to be located and/or relocated in a library or hub development.
The development of this Collection Decision-Making Framework will address some of the major concerns expressed by students in ease of access and use of library materials by ensuring relevance and usability of the collections. In the University of Melbourne Library Client Survey Support October 2005 (Rodski), and many previous surveys, students identified that they always had difficulty finding what they were looking for in the library. These concerns need to be addressed, particularly in an environment where collection space is insufficient and the material is crowded and therefore not easily accessible. The redevelopment of library spaces provides an opportunity to address long-held student concerns as part of the creation of new and innovative Learning Hubs.
-
Background
There are a number of key drivers supporting the development of this Collection Decision-Making Framework including:
- The University Of Melbourne Libraries – 10-year strategic plan http://www.unimelb.edu.au/infostrategy/policies/libraries_plan.html as developed by Dr Kenn Fisher of Rubida Research Pty Ltd in 2004. This strategic plan was developed in the context of the university’s strategic direction to be a leading research university both nationally and internationally. In this report, Dr Fisher proposed the establishment of the Precinct Learning Hub Library Network. A learning hub features a combination of library material collections including cultural assets, student teaching and learning spaces, collaborative learning, support for research, computer facilities, library and IT information support services, student support services and retail outlets. The collections and services will be uniquely planned for each individual hub, according to the academic and research discipline and clientele that has been identified as its service priority
- Comments/concerns expressed by students in both The University of Melbourne Library Client Survey Support October 2005 (Rodski) and in the Quality of Administrative and Support Services for Students (QASSS) Survey 2005
While the initial use of the framework will be in assessing the current Engineering Collection as it moves to become an integral part of the Eastern Precinct Learning Hub centered on the Educational Resource Centre (ERC), the framework will provide a broader basis for the assessment of collections and is supported by the development of a range of communication mechanisms for student and faculty engagement.
Information Services staff will liaise with academic staff in applying the framework to identify which parts of collections should be:
- Included in the relevant Learning Hubs
- Relocated to University of Melbourne off-site storage facilities
- Deselected
- Replaced by the provision of electronic resources.
This framework is underpinned by the principles and approaches outlined in the University’s Collection Policy. Reference also needs to be made to individual subject discipline collection policies, where available.
This Collection Decision-Making Framework provides broad guidance for library and academic staff to make decisions for inclusion of print and other material format in the newly emerging Learning Hubs and/or other relevant library initiatives. However, the context in which these decisions are being made will be provided by the University’s Growing Esteem Strategic Plan http://growingesteem.unimelb.edu.au/about/, and in particular the Melbourne Model http://www.futurestudents.unimelb.edu.au/courses/melbmodel/index.html of undergraduate and postgraduate teaching.
-
Elements of Collection Decision-Making Framework
- Data Template
- Access & location decisions
- Electronic Resources Policy
- De-selection policy
-
Framework Structure:
4.1 Data Template (Collection Usage and Needs Analysis)
Note: Online Usage statistics are not relevant here because this framework is to be applied to collections physically located in libraries.
Material by Usage |
Method of Measurement |
Comment |
| Undergraduate teaching |
Recommended Reading/Prescribed Texts Lists
Reserve Lists
Circulation statistics |
|
| Postgraduate research |
Circulation statistics
Academic (research and teaching) staff input
Library Subject Specialist staff input |
|
| In-house usage |
Re-shelving information |
**Methods of measuring in-house usage are currently being investigated. While there is no identifiable industry standard, a number of other Australian University Libraries’ have examples of appropriate methods. Members of the relevant shelving teams have a large amounts of anecdotal information that is of value. |
| General research and community use |
While Collection Management Policy primarily reflects the university’s learning, teaching and research needs, we acknowledge our broader role as a public institution. |
|
| Types of Material by format: Print |
| Reference Books |
In-house usage
Academic staff input
Library Subject Specialist staff input |
** See above. |
| Monographs |
Circulation statistics
Academic staff input
Library Subject Specialist staff input |
|
| Journals |
Circulation statistics
Academic staff input
Library Subject Specialist staff input |
Not all libraries circulate journals, so this measure will not always be available. |
| Other |
|
|
| Types of Material by format: Non-book |
| *Other |
Circulation statistics
Academic staff input
Library Subject Specialist staff input |
Specific measures will depend on format. |
| |
Circulation statistics
Academic staff input
Library Subject Specialist staff input |
|
*Modifications to Type of Material columns permitted to cater for library and subject variations, for example Music Scores in Music Library. Relevant Library Subject Specialist staff and Library User Committees will be able to provide the most input into this
4.2 Access & location decisions
Categorization of All Materials:
Category |
Location |
Examples: |
Data Source: |
Comment |
AAA |
Must be on campus (in relevant Learning Hub) |
Undergraduate Recommended Reading
Reserve Collection
Reference Material – key items
Journals – key titles
Additions to the collection made within the last 2 years. |
Reading Lists
Reserve Lists
Circulation per annum
Purchase alerts
Library Subject Specialist staff input |
Precise number of loans for inclusion in this category varies according to collection being evaluated. Library Subject Specialists to determine this figure.
Journals on campus - see electronic materials policy.
Purchase alerts – an Innopac function that needs to be activated. |
AA |
Desirable to stay on campus or in a facility that ensures speed and ease of access |
Selected material from Main Collection
Reference Material
Journals (not available electronically) |
Circulation per annum
Academic staff input via Innopac list circulation.
Library Subject Specialist staff input |
Precise no. of loans for inclusion in this category yet to be determined
Journals on campus - see electronic materials policy.
This category may include older runs of journals titles in Category AAA. |
A |
Campus location not essential |
Selected material from Main Collection
Reference Material
Journals not available electronically |
Circulation > 1 per annum
Academic staff input via Innopac list circulation.
Library Subject Specialist staff input |
Precise no. of loans for inclusion in this category, still under discussion.
Journals on campus - see electronic materials policy.
This category may include older runs of journals titles in Categories AAA and/or AA. |
Relegated Material |
U of M Library Store (off campus storage) |
|
|
Retrievable: max 1-day turnaround.
Online ordering. |
Access Only required |
CARM access sufficient. |
|
|
Retrievable: max 5 day turnaround
Online ordering. |
Back to index
|